The Correspondence with the Subpoena Committee on Special Requirements in the 2016 U.S. Capitol Attack and 2020 Electoral Election Campaign
Trump’s lawyers said in the court filings they’ve communicated with the House over the past week and a half as the subpoena deadlines neared, offering to consider answering written questions while expressing “concerns and objections” about the bulk of the document requests. The court documents show that after Trump missed the initial deadline to produce documents, his team replied that he wouldn’t testify and wouldn’t provide any records related to personal communications.
The Justice Department could initiate criminal charges against Trump or his associates for their role in provoking the attack on the Capitol and their effort to overturn the 2020 election.
John King said the committee is trying to make the case that Trump is Oz. When he is presenting himself as powerful it is actually a guy behind a curtain trying to pull a machine.
Contempt. The full House, which is controlled by Democrats, will vote to hold him in contempt of Congress, something it has done with several other uncooperative witnesses.
It is a prosecution. If found guilty, as Bannon was, Trump could theoretically face a minimum of 30 days in jail. Bannon will be sentenced for failing to comply with the House subpoena later this month.
The Senate Oversight Committee’s Response to the Trump-CNN Investigation of 1976, When George Conway and the Supreme Courts Communicated About Trump
George Conway, who is a lawyer and critic of Trump, predicted during an appearance on CNN Thursday that none of that would happen. “This is about laying a marker. This is about triggering a response (from Trump).”
Conway did point out the Supreme Court has already made clear where it stands on Trump’s status as a former president when it ignored his attempt to block the National Archives from sharing information with the committee.
Back when he was president, the Supreme Court punted in 2020 when it sent a dispute over House subpoenas for Trump’s financial records back to lower courts. Justices told lower courts to consider separation of powers even in cases involving the president’s private information. The House Oversight Committee recently reached an agreement with Trump to get access to the documents.
Vice Chairwoman Liz Cheney, R-Wyo., read out the motion, describing Trump’s testimony as an obligation — given that more than 30 witnesses in the investigation invoked the Fifth Amendment in answer to the committee’s questions about Trump, including key Trump allies Roger Stone, Michael Flynn, and John Eastman.
In 1974, Gerald Ford testified before a House subcommittee about his decision to pardon Richard Nixon.
President Thomas Jefferson declined to appear at former Vice President Aaron Burr’s trial for treason even though he was subpoenaed by then-Chief Justice John Marshall. Some documents were provided by Jefferson. Burr was eventually acquitted.
The Select Committee’s Final Hearing on Donald Trump’s Susceptibility to Subpoenas in a Fission on Tax Laws
The financial documents could be accessed by investigators in New York. Trump’s company will go on criminal trial this month on charges of violating tax laws.
A judge forced him to comply with subpoenas from the New York Attorney General in her civil inquiry into his business practices. He invoked the Fifth Amendment against his accusers.
The Trump Organization and the Trump family were sued by James. James petitioned a state court to block Trump from moving his assets in order to shield them from the lawsuit.
The January 6 committee has to finish its work by the end of the next Congress in January of 2023, if it wants to continue.
After more than a year of interviewing witnesses, gathering evidence and holding public meetings, the House select committee concluded its final hearing on Monday by referring former President Donald Trump for four criminal charges.
“We are obligated to seek answers directly from the man who set this all in motion,” she said. “We can act to protect our republic now because every American is entitled to those answers.”
The California Democrat said that they were considering how to deal with members of Congress who didn’t comply with a congressional subpoena.
The chair and vice chairman of the committee said in a statement that the next steps will be evaluated in the days to come.
The committee has the power to hold witnesses in contempt, but lacks the ability to force compliance through the courts.
The lawsuit contends that the House would violate privilege by revealing conversations he had with Justice Department officials and members of Congress about the 2020 election.
It appears that the approach you take on Mr. Trump’s behalf is a delay tactic, according to Thompson.
The truth is that many of Donald Trump’s closest allies are hiding from the Select Committee’s investigation because they know what the witnesses will say. “Donald Trump orchestrated a scheme to overturn a presidential election and block the transfer of power. The American people have an expectation of him to provide answers.
The panel has weighed whether Congress should criminalize members of Congress to another part of the federal government or police itself, and it will be making a decision tomorrow. The House ethics committee can be referred to by congressional mechanisms.
It also referred four fellow members of Congress, all Republicans, to the House ethics committee for failing to comply with subpoenas. They are congressmen who represent California, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Arizona.
The panel voted unanimously to refer the president and others to the justice department for various charges, including conspiracy to defraud the U.S., obstruction of official proceedings, and aiding and abetting those involved in insurrection.
The impact House referrals could have remains unclear because the Department of Justice special counsel investigation is already examining Trump in its extensive probe into January 6.
January 6 committee Chairman Bennie Thompson told reporters that the panel could include five to six other categories of referrals such as ethics referrals to the House Ethics Committee and bar discipline referrals.
“Censure was something that we have considered. Schiff said that the committee will reveal its decision on ethics referrals on Monday.
CNN previously reported that the panel has also weighed criminal referrals for a number of Trump’s closest allies, including former Trump attorney John Eastman, former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows, former DOJ official Jeffrey Clark and former Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani, according to multiple sources.
He believes there is proof that Trump committed crimes while attempting to overturn the results of the election.
“This is someone who, in multiple ways, tried to pressure state officials to find votes that didn’t exist. This is someone who tried to interfere with a joint session, even inciting a mob to attack the Capitol. He said that if that isn’t criminal, he doesn’t know what is.
“If you look at Donald Trump’s acts and you match them up against the statute, it’s a pretty good match,” Schiff told Tapper when asked specifically about a charge of insurrection.
I believe that the president has broken multiple criminal laws. He said you have to be prosecuted for breaking the law, as any other American would do.
Rep. Jamie Raskin: Breaking the First January White House Impeachment Resolution Against a Former President — A Terrible Prediction for the Future
As the Republicans take control of the House in January, it’s not likely the ethics committee would take these on.
But Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., — a member of the Jan. 6 panel who previously served as the lead manager in Trump’s second impeachment trial — tells Morning Edition’s Steve Inskeep that ignoring or burying those recommendations would set “a terrible precedent for the future.”
“It’s of special concern when there’s an attempt to overthrow our election and essentially subdue our constitutional order and have someone seize the presidency who didn’t win it,” he says. “And if members of Congress have knowledge of that and may have been involved in it but refuse to say anything about it, we’re setting a precedent for future attacks on democracy itself. It’s the responsibility of our committee to make sure that we prevent coups, insurrections, electoral sabotage and political violence in the future.
As for Trump, who has already announced his bid for reelection, Raskin says the question is not whether potentially prosecuting a former president is the right thing for the country, but whether or not he engaged in criminal conduct.
Trump satisfies the elements for obstructing an official proceeding, Raskin says, adding, “that was the whole purpose of his scheme and he succeeded in interrupting it for four hours, the only time that’s ever happened in American history.”
“In a society where all of us are treated equally under the law, the fact that he’s a former president would make no more difference than the fact that he’s a former businessman or TV star,” he says.
Source: https://www.npr.org/2022/12/20/1144311577/jan-6-trump-criminal-referrals-jamie-raskin
The Ethics Committee of the Commission on Investigating the Propagation of Gun Violence in the United States. I. Donald Trump’s Plan to Run the World Down
More than 900 people have been prosecuted for crimes like assaulting federal officers, destroying federal property, seditious conspiracy, attempt to overthrow or put down the government. Why should the ring leaders and the masterminds of this plan be going to jail, while the foot soldiers are not? Look, if Donald Trump had succeeded, he’d be bragging about it, how he was the one who came up with the whole plan. It’s very clear to those of us who’ve given two years of our lives to studying this that none of it would have happened without the will of Donald Trump.
The ethics committee is split between Democrats and Republicans and they’re facing a pretty profound question, which is: If members of Congress get subpoenaed to testify about their knowledge of a criminal offense, and this one an attack on the constitution itself, can they just blow off the subpoena? We are not able to take them to court because the Speech or Debate Clause makes it hard for us to hold people to account who are outside of Congress. Only the ethics committee could determine if they should be referred to it. I hope the members of the ethics committee are able to address this very serious problem.
The work of our committee is not kept secret. We want the whole country to see all of the transcripts, all of the interviews, everything that took place, so we’re going to try to make it public as quickly as possible. Obviously, someone with a jaundiced eye could go in and try to look for something else, but we’re used to that at this point and we really do feel like we’re standing up for democracy for future generations.
Most of the public knows that Donald Trump’s attorney general said that his claims were BS. Donald Trump was aware he was in a crowd of people with guns, and he wanted to wave them in. They know that he said if you fight you won’t have a country anymore. They understand that he took no concern to try to protect us against the mob that he unleashed against us — so he didn’t call the Army, he didn’t call the National Guard, he sat there in his little dining room watching this unfold like a perfect bystander or someone from another country or another planet. He was not interested in trying to defend us. I think that story is indelibly imprinted in the public imagination.