The Protecting Kids on Social Media Act: Bipartisan Sensitivity to State and Local Laws in the State of the Art and in the Work Families

A proposal that was recently introduced in the US Senate would make it illegal for kids under the age of 18 to use social media. The Protecting Kids on Social Media Act is a new measure aimed at protecting the nation’s children from the dangers of social media. Specifically, it bars children under 13 from creating accounts on social media apps, while also greatly curtailing the algorithms tech companies could deploy on people between 13 and 17 years old. Under 13 users can still see online content if they don’t log into an account. The bill would also require parental consent before anyone under 18 could create a profile.

The bill permits the pilot program to keep an aggregate data that is not related to individual users so that it cannot be linked to them, though the bill doesn’t mention whether or not any private information can be passed to the social networks. Louisiana has a law similar to this that requires a government ID to access adult websites. Individuals and social media platforms won’t be required to participate in the program.

This new bill echoes laws already enacted in some states. Utah’s governor signed controversial laws requiring parental consent for users under 18 to use social media in March. Arkansas’ governor signed a law requiring parental approval for under- 18 users just a few weeks later, but it excludes most social media platforms.

Government oversight of social media platforms could potentially end the internet as we know it. Bipartisan skepticism is being met with the bipartisan legislation.

When Tipper Gore tried to ban music for certain people, we went through this.

“Let’s be clear, this bill is completely content neutral,” says senator Chris Murphy, a Connecticut Democrat. It says you cannot build a programme that leads vulnerable children down deep, deep dark rabbit holes.

The broadly bipartisan effort also demonstrates the pressure that party leaders on both sides of the aisle are under, after years of watching similar efforts fail to protect children.

Freshman Senator, who is a Republican, ran as “a momma on a mission” and said that the topic is personal for her and the others. “Bringing the issues that we talk about as parents in the home, with our friends, we watch unfold before us in our schools and our communities, that’s what we’re here to do, is to bring that voice, the voice of parents,” Britt says.

The opposite is true, as to what their measure might mean for the future of tech entrepreneurs. That’s what we’re fighting for. “You want our kids to be healthy and prepared to achieve their American dream.”

Four Young Candidates in the U.S. Senate: Cotton, Murphy, And The Other 42-Codgett Sensorships

Senator Tom Cotton is a Republican. The Democratic side has senator Murphy from Connecticut as one of the lead sponsors. All four are young, in Senate terms at least, and all have young children.