The third day of Gwyneth Paltrow’s ski trial features testimony from a neuropsychologist and two daughters of the man who sued


A Second Hit-and-Run Ski Collision and $2 million in Damages to the 76-year-old Gwyneth Paltrow

In an initial version of the suit, Sanderson sought $3.1 million in damages, KSL.com reported. In May 2022, Third District Judge Kent Holmberg ruled that it wasn’t a hit and run ski crash and dismissed some of Sanderson’s claims against Paltrow. The 76-year-old is now seeking $300,000 in damages.

According to the countersuit, Paltrow was enjoying skiing with her family in Utah when she was hit by a fellow uphill from her. She sustained a full ‘body blow.’ Ms. Paltrow was angry with Plaintiff, and said so. Plaintiff apologized. She didn’t ski for the rest of the day because she was upset and shook.

There was a $3.1 million lawsuit against Gwyneth Paltrow, but later he amended it and now is seeking $300,000 in damages according to court documents.

The Innocence of Gwyneth Paltrow: A Countersuit against Bernie Sanderson for a Fat Man who Plowed Into Her

The judge and attorneys for both sides gave instructions to the eight-person jury Tuesday morning, and then the lawyers for each side introduced themselves to the court.

It is unclear if Paltrow will take the stand but her attorney told the jury some family members who were skiing with her at the time of the incident will testify.

Lawrence Buhler, an attorney for Sanderson, began opening arguments stating, “Distracted skiers cause crashes. Gwyneth Paltrow knew that looking up the mountain and to the side while skiing down the mountain was dangerous.

Paltrow’s attorney Stephen Owens told the jury that Sanderson’s claims that the actress bolted from the mountain after ramming into him were totally fabricated.

You’re going to be sad forSanderson but that’s not why you’re here. You’re here to figure out if someone negligently crashed into someone or if no one did,” he noted.

Meantime, the Oscar-winning actress and entrepreneur filed her own countersuit about a month after Sanderson in 2019. She said he was to blame for the crash. She described him being uphill from her and her family when he suddenly plowed into her back, delivering a “full body blow.” According to Paltrow, she was angry with Sanderson and he apologized.

On Wednesday morning, Steve Owens raised an objection to the still photographer who was taking photos in the courtroom. Judge Kent Holmberg agreed it was a violation of the court’s decorum order, explaining still images of the proceedings should “follow the mic.” The camera was seized and the judge said the reporter would be removed it if happened again.

The impact of the crash on the family of a young man who had a hard time falling into someone with a strangeness: James Fong

He testified that the man was degraded after the collision and stopped doing a lot of activities prior to it.

Fong described him as having symptoms that included cognitive issues, fatigue, mood and personality changes, headaches and a lot of pain.

During the cross examination, James came to the conclusion that it was possible that something else was to blame for the symptoms of Sanderson.

She said people would say he is fun loving and very extiguous. He liked people, dancing and outdoor activity.

A year and a half after the crash, the daughter of the man who crashed said her father’s processing speed seemed to have changed.

She said he wasn’t engaged with anyone. “He had kind of taken himself to a remote corner. It was the first time I had felt something terribly wrong.

The founder of Goop was skiing with the Falchuks – a trip to Perseus with Randall-Sundrum

The actress and Goop founder said on the day of the collision with Sanderson she was skiing with her two kids, now-husband Brad Falchuk and his two children. The first day of the trip, the collision took place.